California Catholic Bishops Ask Supreme Court to Revisit Case Challenging Statute of Limitations


California’s Catholic bishops have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to consider a case challenging a state law that extends the time for survivors of childhood sexual abuse to file their claims.

The petition, first reported this week by the Catholic News Agency, was filed April 15 by nine Catholic dioceses and archdioceses in California after the California Supreme Court declined to hear the case – Catholic Bishop Oakland Roman c. California Superior Court of Los Angeles County – in November.

In 2002, California decreed a one-year window allowing plaintiffs to file sexual abuse claims against the Catholic Church and others “even though the statute of limitations had expired decades earlier,” the bishops said in their petition.

By the end of that year, the state attempted to revive lapsed claims three more times, but former Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed every bill, the petition notes. But Brown’s successor, Gavin Newsom, signed legislation in 2019 that gave some assault victims more time to sue, in what the bishops call “an unconstitutional double-rebirth scheme.”

“This time,” reads the Bishops’ petition, “the past conduct of the defendants is subject not only to claims for compensatory and punitive damages which were previously barred twice, but also to additional penalties (under the form of “treble” damages) based on a newly defined category of “cover-up” activity.

The Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, or SNAP, blasted the bishops’ petition in a statement Wednesday, May 4.

“Attempting to invalidate this law by circumventing lawmakers now is dishonest at best and also a slap in the face to the thousands of victims – not just Catholic victims – seeking comfort and justice,” SNAP said in the statement.

The extension of the window of time to file complaints, SNAP said, was necessary because survivors of abuse in the 1990s and early 2000s “have yet to realize the damage done to them and remain silent in their pain”.

But the dioceses say that during the initial one-year window, they faced more than 1,000 lawsuits alleging misconduct dating back to the 1930s and reached a series of settlements worth more than $100,000. a billion dollars “to put an end to this business”, according to the petition.

“To fund these settlements, they expended significant resources, sold vast tracts of Church property, and in some cases exhausted or abandoned insurance coverage for past and future abuse claims,” ​​the petition reads. .

“The review is critical now, before the Catholic Church in the largest state in the union is forced to litigate hundreds or thousands of cases seeking potentially billions of dollars in retroactive punitive damages,” the clerics said. bishops.

The nine dioceses and archdioceses listed in the petition are represented by: Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles; Bishop Kevin W. Vann of Orange; Bishop Joseph V. Brennan of Fresno; Bishop Daniel E. Garcia of Monterey; Bishop Michael C. Barber of Oakland; Bishop Jaime Soto of Sacramento; Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco; Bishop Oscar Cantú of San José; and Bishop Robert F. Vasa of Santa Rosa.


Comments are closed.